What is wrong with 2701?

Do you want to discuss about these problems? Go now!
Users are shared (no need to re-register).

Moderator: Board moderators

Post Reply
Dmytro Chernysh
Experienced poster
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:51 am

What is wrong with 2701?

Post by Dmytro Chernysh » Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:09 pm

Here is my output for 2701. I think it's correct but WA
Why??? Maybe the special corrector works improperly?

const
a:array [1..200] of string[20]=(
'10',
'10',
'111',
'100',
'10',
'1110',
'1001',
'1000',
'111111111',
'100',
'1100',
'11100',
'1001',
'10010',
'1110',
'10000',
'11101',
'1111111110',
'11001',
'100',
'10101',
'110',
'110101',
'111000',
'1000',
'10010',
'1101111111',
'100100',
'1101101',
'1110',
'111011',
'100000',
'111111',
'111010',
'10010',
'11111111100',
'111',
'110010',
'10101',
'1000',
'11111',
'101010',
'1101101',
'1100',
'1111111110',
'1101010',
'10011',
'1110000',
'1100001',
'100',
'100011',
'100100',
'100011',
'11011111110',
'110',
'1001000',
'11001',
'11011010',
'11011111',
'11100',
'100101',
'1110110',
'1111011111',
'1000000',
'10010',
'1111110',
'1101011',
'1110100',
'10000101',
'10010',
'10011',
'111111111000',
'10001',
'1110',
'11100',
'1100100',
'1001',
'101010',
'10010011',
'10000',
'1111111101',
'111110',
'101011',
'1010100',
'111010',
'11011010',
'11010111',
'11000',
'11010101',
'1111111110',
'1001',
'11010100',
'10000011',
'100110',
'110010',
'11100000',
'11100001',
'11000010',
'111111111111111111',
'100',
'101',
'1000110',
'11100001',
'1001000',
'101010',
'1000110',
'100010011',
'110111111100',
'1001010111',
'110000',
'111000',
'10010000',
'1011011',
'110010',
'1101010',
'110110100',
'10101111111',
'110111110',
'100111011',
'111000',
'11011',
'1001010',
'10001100111',
'11101100',
'1000',
'11110111110',
'11010011',
'10000000',
'100100001',
'10010',
'101001',
'11111100',
'11101111',
'11010110',
'11011111110',
'11101000',
'10001',
'100001010',
'110110101',
'100100',
'10011',
'100110',
'1001',
'1111111110000',
'11011010',
'100010',
'1100001',
'11100',
'110111',
'11100',
'1110001',
'11001000',
'10111110111',
'10010',
'1110110',
'1010100',
'10101101011',
'100100110',
'100011',
'100000',
'11101111',
'11111111010',
'1010111',
'1111100',
'1111110',
'1010110',
'11111011',
'10101000',
'10111101',
'111010',
'1111011111',
'110110100',
'1011001101',
'110101110',
'100100',
'110000',
'100101111',
'110101010',
'11010111',
'11111111100',
'1001111',
'10010',
'100101',
'110101000',
'1110',
'100000110',
'1001011',
'1001100',
'1010111010111',
'110010',
'11101111',
'111000000',
'11001',
'111000010',
'101010',
'110000100',
'1101000101',
'1111111111111111110',
'111000011',
'1000');

PdR
New poster
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 4:27 am

Re: What is wrong with 2701?

Post by PdR » Thu Nov 06, 2003 8:56 pm

Dmytro_Chernysh wrote:Here is my output for 2701. I think it's correct but WA
Why??? Maybe the special corrector works improperly?
I guess so, because I'm checking with something like:
[c]mod = 0;
for (i = 0; s != 0; i ++)
mod = (mod * 10 + s - '0') % n;
assert (mod == 0);[/c]
Where s cointains the solution;
And I've also got WA...

Maybe no one wrote the special corrector?

Post Reply

Return to “ACM ICPC Archive Board”