2684

Do you want to discuss about these problems? Go now!
Users are shared (no need to re-register).

Moderator: Board moderators

Post Reply
Caesum
Experienced poster
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 12:14 am
Location: UK
Contact:

2684

Post by Caesum » Wed Dec 10, 2003 8:57 pm

How about more than 10 seconds for this, or reduce the input ? I mean look at the stats...... lowest time is like 8.1 seconds, and nearly everyone times out on it......

If you think that the current time is adequate, then I suggest lowering the time on problems like 10290 where 100 seconds is way too much

Dmytro Chernysh
Experienced poster
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:51 am

Post by Dmytro Chernysh » Wed Dec 10, 2003 9:57 pm

Caesum, but you got the best time on 10290! :-)

Adrian Kuegel
Guru
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2001 2:00 am
Location: Germany

Post by Adrian Kuegel » Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:20 am

I agree with Caesum that the time limit for this problem should be increased. If I remember it right it was up at 20 seconds during the regional contest.
I think that also the time limit of problem 2686 should be increased, I think my program is really fast but I passed only with difficulties.
And another problem where nobody has accepted so far (because of Time limit I think) is 2737. Can someone who knows what time limit was given for this problem during the regional contest say what the time limit was?

Post Reply

Return to “ACM ICPC Archive Board”